Virtual patients versus standardized patients for improving clinical reasoning skills in ophthalmology residents. A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: History taking and clinical reasoning are important skills that require knowledge, cognition and meta-cognition. It is important that a trainee must experience multiple encounters with different patients to practice these skills. However, patient safety is also important, and trainees are not allowed to handle critically ill patients. To address this issue, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the effectiveness of using Virtual Patients (VP) versus Standardized Patients (SP) in acquiring clinical reasoning skills in ophthalmology postgraduate residents. METHODS: Postgraduate residents from two hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan, were randomized to either the VP group or the SP group and were exposed to clinical reasoning exercise via the VP or SP for 30 min after the pretest. This was followed by a posttest. One month after this activity, a follow-up posttest was conducted. The data were collected and analysed using IBM-SPSS version 25. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to track the effect of learning skills over time. RESULTS: The mean age of the residents was 28.5 ± 3 years. The male to female ratio was 1:1.1. For the SP group, the mean scores were 12.6 ± 3.08, 16.39 ± 3.01 and 15.39 ± 2.95, and for the VP group, the mean scores were 12.7 ± 3.84, 16.30 ± 3.19 and 15.65 ± 3.18 for the pretest, posttest and follow-up posttest, respectively (p value < 0.00). However, the difference between the VP and SP groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.896). Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between the VP and SP groups regarding the retention of clinical reasoning ability. In terms of learning gain, compared with the VP group, the SP group had a score of 51.46% immediately after clinical reasoning exercise as compared to VP group, in which it was 49.1%. After one month, it was 38.01 in SP and 40.12% in VP group. CONCLUSION: VPs can be used for learning clinical reasoning skills in postgraduate ophthalmology residents in a safe environment. These devices can be used repeatedly without any risk to the real patient. Although similarly useful, SP is limited by its nonavailability for repeated exercises.

Trends in ophthalmology applicants going unmatched in the Canadian Resident Matching Service.

Background: Applicants to ophthalmology have high rates of going unmatched during the CaRMS process, but how this compares to other competitive or surgical specialties remains unclear. Our research aims to examine this phenomenon by identifying trends and comparing match data with other specialties, to identify disparities that may inform the need for future interventions to improve the match process for applicants. Methods: We used a cross-sectional analysis of data provided by CaRMS on the residency match from 2013 to 2022. Results: We obtained data from 608 ophthalmology, 5,153 surgery, and 3,092 top five (most competitive) specialty first choice applicants from 2013-2022. Ophthalmology applicants were more likely to go unmatched (18.9% [120/608]) than applicants to the top five (11.9% [371/3,092]) and surgical (13.5% [702/5,153]) specialties (p<0.001) and were twice as likely to rank no alternate disciplines (31.8%, p < 0.001) over the study period. In the first iteration, when alternate disciplines were ranked, the match rate to alternate disciplines was highest for ophthalmology applicants (0.41, p < 0.001). The majority (57.8%) of unmatched ophthalmology applicants do not participate in the second iteration. Conclusion: Compared to other competitive specialties, first choice ophthalmology applicants were more likely to go unmatched, rank no alternate disciplines, and choose not to participate in the second iteration. Ophthalmology applicant behaviours should be further studied to help explain these study findings.

Contexte: Les candidats à l'ophtalmologie ont un taux élevé de non-jumelage au cours du processus CaRMS, mais une comparaison avec d'autres spécialités compétitives ou chirurgicales reste à faire. Notre travail a pour but d'examiner ce phénomène en identifiant des tendances et en comparant les données de jumelage avec celles d'autres spécialités, à la recherche de disparités susceptibles d'éclairer le besoin d'interventions futures pour améliorer le processus de jumelage pour les candidats. Méthodes: Nous avons procédé à une analyse transversale des données fournies par CaRMS sur le jumelage des résidents de 2013 à 2022. Résultats: Nous avons obtenu des données sur 608 candidats en ophtalmologie, 5 153 en chirurgie et 3 092 candidats dont le premier choix était l'une des cinq spécialités les plus compétitives de 2013 à 2022. Les candidats en ophtalmologie étaient plus susceptibles de ne pas être jumelés (18,9 % [120/608]) que les candidats aux cinq spécialités les plus compétitives (11,9 % [371/3 092]) et aux spécialités chirurgicales (13,5 % [702/5 153]) (p<0,001), et étaient deux fois plus susceptibles de ne classer aucune autre discipline (31,8 %, p<0,001) au cours de la période d'étude. Lors du premier tour, lorsque des disciplines alternatives ont été classées, le taux de jumelage avec les disciplines alternatives était le plus élevé pour les candidats en ophtalmologie (0,41, p<0,001). La majorité (57,8 %) des candidats non jumelés en ophtalmologie ne participent pas au deuxième tour. Conclusion: Comparativement à d'autres spécialités compétitives, les candidats dont le premier choix étaient l'ophtalmologie étaient plus susceptibles de ne pas être jumelés, de ne pas classer d'autres disciplines et de choisir de ne pas participer au deuxième tour. Les comportements des candidats en ophtalmologie devraient faire l'objet d'études plus approfondies afin d'expliquer nos résultats.

Perspectives on a virtual student-led research conference in ophthalmology.

We share our experience of organizing a one-day virtual educational event, the first Canadian national student ophthalmology conference, in response to the need for ophthalmology career exploration. The conference included mentorship with residents, research presentations, keynote speakers, and more. Following the event, students expressed some improvement in accessing ophthalmology mentorship and research opportunities, along with a modest enhancement in their understanding of the specialty. We provide insights into the organizational framework and quality improvement results, aiming to assist students in adapting similar events for various specialities.

Nous partageons notre expérience portant sur l'organisation d'un événement éducatif virtuel d'une journée: la première conférence nationale canadienne des étudiants en ophtalmologie. Cette initiative a été prise en réponse au besoin d'exploration des carrières en ophtalmologie. La conférence comprenait des séances de mentorat avec des résidents, des présentations de recherche, des conférenciers d'honneur, entre autres. Suite à cet événement, les étudiants ont exprimé une amélioration dans l'accès au mentorat et aux opportunités de recherche en ophtalmologie, ainsi qu'une modeste amélioration de leur compréhension de la spécialité. Nous offrons un aperçu du cadre organisationnel et des résultats de l'amélioration de la qualité, dans le but d'aider d'autres étudiants à organiser des événements similaires pour diverses spécialités.

A survey of perceptions of exposure to new technology in residents and practicing ophthalmologists.

BACKGROUND: Incorporation of the rapid advances in ophthalmologic surgical and diagnostic techniques inherent in the field poses a challenge to residency training programs. This study investigates exposure to new technologies during residency and perception of its impact on practice patterns. METHODS: Ophthalmology residents at various training levels and practicing ophthalmologists who had completed their training were invited to participate in a survey study assessing exposure to various technologies in residency and in practice. Data collection occurred from December 2022 to June 2023. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: The study received 132 unique responses, including 63 ophthalmology residents and 69 practicing ophthalmologists. 65.2% (n = 45) of practicing ophthalmologists and 47.6% (n = 30) of current residents reported discussion/training on newly developed products on the market (e.g. premium IOLS, MIGS), was "minimally discussed but not emphasized" or "not discussed at all" in residency. 55.1% (n = 38) of practicing ophthalmologists reported that exposure to new technologies during residency did influence types of technologies employed during practice. The majority resident physicians reported enjoying being trained on newer technology and feeling more prepared for future changes in the field (95.2%, n = 60) and felt that having industry partnerships in residency enhances education and training (90.5%, n = 57). CONCLUSIONS: Considering how to maximize exposure to newer technologies/devices during residency training is important, and may contribute to training more confident, adaptable surgeons, who are more likely to critically consider new technologies and adopt promising ones into their future clinical practice.

Preclinical training of future ocular surgeons: a French opinion-based study.

PURPOSE: To assess ophthalmology residents satisfaction regarding surgical training during residency in France. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 28 questions was designed and sent to residents of ophthalmology across the 27 French regions. RESULTS: A total of 30.3% ophthalmology residents in France completed our questionnaire. All French regions participated. They rated 5,27 ± 2.42/10 the global surgical training during residency. They had performed at least one step of any type of ocular surgery for 93.4% of them, while 80.7% had completed at least one full cataract surgery, by the beginning of their second year of residency on average (Paris: 2.59 ± 1.36 semesters; regions: 4.05 ± 1.96 semesters, p < 0.0001). Only 48.9% identified a surgical mentor during their residency, but 82.2% did not clearly identify surgical goals & objectives during their training. Simulation was available for any type of ocular surgery to all residents in the Paris (Île-de-France) region and to 78.1% in other regions (p < 0.005). Residents who accessed drylabs and wetlabs gave a satisfaction score of 7.31 ± 1.89/10 and 6.39 ± 2.15/10 to it respectively. Simulation was a mandatory part of the curriculum for 35.2% of the resident. They commented on on reduced access to subspecialized surgery. They were willing for more access to simulation and surgery on real patients, as well for closer mentoring and clearly defined surgical goals within the curriculum. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmology residents seemed globally satisfied with their surgical training nationwide, although we observed disparities across region. They largely acknowledged a lack of standard procedures nationwide. They acclaimed simulation during the initial phase of residency, progressively switching towards surgery on real patients. An "operating license" during residency could be a viable way for the resident to demonstrate that they have acquired enough surgical abilities to perform surgery on real patients.

Sex Disparities in Ophthalmology From Training Through Practice: A Systematic Review.

Importance: Sex-based research in medicine has revealed inequities against females on almost every metric at almost every career stage; ophthalmology is no exception. Objective: To systematically review the experiences of females in ophthalmology (FiO) from training through practice in high-income countries (HICs). Evidence Review: A systematic review of English-language studies, published between January 1990 and May 2022, relating to FiO in HICs was performed. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase electronic databases were searched, as well as the Journal of Academic Ophthalmology as it was not indexed in the searched databases. Studies were organized by theme at each career stage, starting in medical school when an interest in ophthalmology is expressed, and extending up to retirement. Findings: A total of 91 studies, 87 cross-sectional and 4 cohort, were included. In medical school, mentorship and recruitment of female students into ophthalmology was influenced by sex bias, with fewer females identifying with ophthalmologist mentors and gender stereotypes perpetuated in reference letters written by both male and female referees. In residency, females had unequal learning opportunities, with lower surgical case volumes than male trainees and fewer females pursued fellowships in lucrative subspecialties. In practice, female ophthalmologists had lower incomes, less academic success, and poorer representation in leadership roles. Female ophthalmologists had a greater scholarly impact factor than their male counterparts, but this was only after approximately 30 years of publication experience. Pervasive throughout all stages of training and practice was the experience of greater sexual harassment among females from both patients and colleagues. Despite these disparities, some studies found that females reported equal overall career satisfaction rating with males in ophthalmology, whereas others suggested higher burnout rates. Conclusions and Relevance: Ophthalmology is approaching sex parity, however, the increase in the proportion of females in ophthalmology had not translated to an increase in female representation in leadership positions. Sex disparities persisted across many domains including recruitment, training, practice patterns, academic productivity, and income. Interventions may improve sex equity in the field.

Leadership in ophthalmology training : Opportunities and risks of medical specialist education.

Medical specialist training requires constant improvement and adaptation of the contents to the current situation. Nowadays, young physicians have the opportunity to select among the most renowned institutions and can choose the one most qualified for their training. Hospitals on the other hand still have the desire to recruit highly qualified physicians for their resident programs, which requires a good, well-rounded and reliable offer by the department under good leadership. Thus, among other issues a modern and multilingual homepage is already an important instrument for successfully addressing applicants and winning them over for the department. In addition to a well-planned and structured training plan (e.g., the "Homburg Curriculum") and a so-called "resident guide", many other additional offers are nowadays part of a successful training, such as structured internal and external specialist training courses, well thought out research concepts available to all interested parties, wet labs for practical exercises on pig's eyes and as the latest most innovative addition, a virtual reality simulator. Due to a structured curriculum with regular continuous education during the daily early morning meetings and an exchange program with another university eye hospital, not only the residents can benefit but ultimately also the department itself. In addition, future specialists are involved in the respective organization (so-called "service teams") from the very beginning. This conveys a great deal of knowledge and expertise but also organizational skills and thus improves the quality of training. In any case, standardized residency training with a view beyond the horizon, which is transparently organized and reliably carried out, improves the quality of training in order to become a certified ophthalmologist and increases the satisfaction of the residents. A department which is committed and can offer a wide range of services will benefit from motivated and satisfied employees in a good interpersonal climate, which in the end benefits not only the team but also the patients.

Gender Representation Among Ophthalmology Fellowship Directors in 2022.

PURPOSE: Women are underrepresented in several medical specialties, including ophthalmology. Reducing disparities is critical in diversifying perspectives and increasing equity within ophthalmology, both of which can ultimately improve care delivery. We examined ophthalmic fellowship programs directors in the United States to investigate gender disparities by subspecialty. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of ophthalmology fellowship program directors in academic medical centers. The primary outcome measure was a descriptive analysis of current fellowship directors in 2022 when stratified by subspecialty and demographic features. RESULTS: Analysis was conducted on 358 fellowship directors in the United States. Twenty-nine percent of directors were women. Female directors had significantly fewer years since residency graduation compared with male peers (17 vs 24; P < .001); however, no differences were observed by program type (P = .896) or location (P = 0.104). Differences in female director representation were observed by subspecialty (P < .001), with the greatest percentage of women in pediatric ophthalmology (54%), other (oncology and pathology) fellowships (50%), and medical retina (40%). The subspecialties with the lowest percentage of female directors were oculoplastic and reconstructive surgery (13%) surgical retina and vitreous (16%). CONCLUSION: There are disparities in female representation in academic leadership positions across ophthalmic subspecialties. Addressing this difference may have critical impacts on career advancement and opportunities available for marginalized groups in medicine.

Predictors of Ophthalmology Resident Performance From Medical Student Application Materials.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether elements in ophthalmology residency applications are predictors of future resident performance. DESIGN: This multi-institutional, cross-sectional, observational study retrospectively reviewed the residency application materials of ophthalmology residents who graduated from residency from 2006 through 2018. Resident performance was scored by 2 faculty reviewers in 4 domains (clinical, surgical, academic, and global performance). Correlation between specific elements of the residency application and resident performance was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficients (univariate) and linear regression (multivariate) for continuous variables and logistic regression (multivariate) for categorical variables. SETTING: Seven ophthalmology residency programs in the US. PARTICIPANTS: Ophthalmology residents who graduated from their residency program. RESULTS: High-performing residents were a diverse group, in terms of sex, ethnicity, visa status, and educational background. Residents with United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores higher than the national average for that year had significantly higher scores in all 4 performance domains than those who scored at or below the mean (all domains P < 0.05). Residents who had honors in at least 4 core clerkships and who were members of Alpha Omega Alpha Medical Honor Society also had higher scores in all 4 performance domains (all domains P ≤ 0.04). Step 1 score (ρ=0.26, P < 0.001) and the difference between Step 1 score and the national average for that year (ρ=0.19, P = 0.009) positively correlated with total resident performance scores. Residents who passed the American Board of Ophthalmology Written Qualifying Examination or Oral Examination on their first attempt had significantly higher Step 1/2 scores (P ≤ 0.005), Ophthalmology Knowledge Assessment Program scores (P = 0.001), and resident performance scores (P ≤ 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In this new landscape of increasing numbers of applicants to residency programs and changing of the Step 1 score to pass/fail, our findings may help guide selection committees as they holistically review applicants to select exceptional future residents in ophthalmology.

Analysis of Reapplicants to Ophthalmology Residency: Factors Associated with Successful Matching.

BACKGROUND: Ophthalmology residency programs are highly competitive and each year there are many unmatched reapplicants who must make time-sensitive decisions on how to prepare for their reapplication. Our analysis of reapplication factors will be the first evidence-based guide to reapplying ophthalmology. OBJECTIVE: To determine the components of a reapplicants application that contribute and that do not contribute to ophthalmology residency match success. METHODS: Eighty-eight total reapplicants to Dell Medical School's Department of Ophthalmology residency program for the year of 2022 and 2023 were analyzed in a retrospective review in 2023 based on their San Francisco match applications. We assessed match success in the context of demographics, academic performance, cognitive measures, letters of recommendation, personal statements, and extracurricular activities. RESULTS: Of 84 reapplicants who completed the San Francisco Match, 41 matched successfully (48.8%). Factors that significantly affected match success include quantity of LORs written by ophthalmologists (P = .0143), choice of interim year activity (p = .0019), and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge score (P = .0017). Our findings demonstrate that noncontributory factors to reapplicant match rate include number of publications during research years, demographics, clinical grades, Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) membership, LOR qualities, and Step 1 score. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmology residency reapplicants should focus their efforts on finding a research year or established pre-ophthalmology residency program for their interim year and bolstering their letters of recommendations within the field. The quality of in-specialty relationships and letters of recommendation are more impactful than the number of publications during a research gap year. Step 2 CK score is a significant factor but would have already been determined by the time of reapplication. Metrics such as Step 1 scores, AOA status, number of volunteering experiences, and LOR and personal statement qualities had no effect on a reapplicant's chance of matching.

A Novel Video-Based Skills Curriculum for Incoming Ophthalmology Residents.

BACKGROUND: Given limited pre-residency ophthalmology exposure, skill training for PGY-2 ophthalmology residents is essential. However, orientation experiences vary, and skills acquisition is often not measured. OBJECTIVE: A novel video-based orientation curriculum was developed and implemented to standardize and effectively teach ophthalmic examination skills to incoming ophthalmology residents. METHODS: An instructional video library (VL) on ophthalmic exam skills was created in 2020. Prior to any instruction, PGY2s were recorded performing basic ophthalmic exams (BOE) using slit-lamp recording smartphone adapters. After a 2-week orientation involving live teaching, practice, and self-directed library review, ophthalmic exams were again recorded. A 36-point ophthalmic exam skills checklist expanding upon the Ophthalmic Clinical Evaluation Exercise (OCEX) was developed for scoring videos. Residents also completed pre- and post- surveys assessing their comfort with the ophthalmic exam. RESULT: 7 of 11 incoming PGY-2 residents (63.7%) ophthalmology residents participated. Average recorded OCEX score improved from 16.5 ± 5.8 to (p = .0002) to 30.9 ± 2.7. Surveyed resident comfort with the exam increased from 2.4 ± 0.6 to 4.2 ± 0.5 on a 5-point Likert scale (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Our video library orientation curriculum was effective in rapidly increasing resident comfort and BOE skills. With the launch of the integrated internship model, the VL curriculum may be effective for training ophthalmology PGY1s, medical students and non-ophthalmology providers.

Educators' consideration of learner motivation in ophthalmology education in medical school: Influences on teaching practice and course design.

BACKGROUND: Ophthalmology education in medical school has historically neglected the impact of autonomous motivation on student learning and wellbeing. This study aimed to understand ophthalmology educators' consideration and application of student motivation in ophthalmology medical education. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lead ophthalmology educators from Australian and New Zealand medical schools participated in an online semi-structured in-depth interview. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Codes were generated and aligned into overarching themes. FINDINGS: Six educators participated in the study. Five main themes arose from the transcripts: the lack of explicit consideration of student motivation, implicit consideration of motivation in curriculum design and in teaching practices, the impact of innovation on motivation and the relationship between teacher and student motivation. Participants also commented on trends in ophthalmology education including generalists' confidence in managing ophthalmic disease, the role of fundoscopy in medical education and time pressure on ophthalmology in medical schools. CONCLUSION: There has only been an implicit instead of explicit consideration of motivation in ophthalmology education in medical school, which leaves an unfulfilled potential for teaching practices to impact the affective along with cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning. This study highlights the need for motivation to be explicitly incorporated into the development of teaching practices and curriculum reform.

Demographics, Practice Analysis, and Geographic Distribution of Neuro-Ophthalmologists in the United States in 2023.

PURPOSE: To assess the demographic characteristics and geographic distribution of neuro-ophthalmologists practicing in the United States. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Neuro-ophthalmologists across the United States. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, public databases from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, North American Neuro-ophthalmology Society, American Neurological Association, and American Academy of Neurology were used to identify neuro-ophthalmologists in the United States as of April 2023. Providers' office locations were geocoded using ArcGIS pro, version 2.9 (Esri). Data on age, sex, and residency and fellowship training were collected. Analysis was performed using SPSS 28.0 (IBM Corp.). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neuro-ophthalmologists' demographics, and information about their medical education, postgraduate education, residency training, fellowship training, years in practice, practice environment, and geographic distribution of neuro-ophthalmologists across the United States. RESULTS: A total of 635 neuro-ophthalmologists (436 male, 68.7%) were identified. The majority (599, 94.3%) graduated from an allopathic medical school. Most of the 85 physicians who held a secondary graduate degree had a PhD (54, 63.5%). Although approximately three-quarters (429, 67.6%) completed their residency in ophthalmology, 159 (25%) had residency positions in neurology and 47 (7.4%) had residency positions in both. Approximately one-third (191, 30.0%) were trained in more than 1 fellowship, including oculoplastics (78, 12.3%) or pediatric ophthalmology (53, 8.3%). The average post-fellowship years of experience was 23.7±13.7 years, with 134 (21.1%) in their early career (< 10 years), 120 (18.9%) in their mid-careers (10-19 years), and 381 (60.0%) in their late careers (> 20 years). Male neuro-ophthalmologists had 10.5±1.1 more years of experience than female neuro-ophthalmologists (P < 0.001). Three states (Maine, South Dakota, Wyoming) and 2897 counties (93.2%) had no neuro-ophthalmologists. Counties without a neuro-ophthalmologist had lower median income (P < 0.001), lower access to a vehicle (P = 0.024), and lower rates of health insurance (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Practicing neuro-ophthalmologists are mostly male and often are trained in more than 1 subspecialty. More than half of the practicing neuro-ophthalmologists are in their late careers, which may further exacerbate the existing geographic and socioeconomic disparities in access to neuro-ophthalmology. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Impact of Gender and Underrepresented in Medicine Status on Research Productivity Among Ophthalmology Residency Applicants.

PURPOSE: Insufficient representation of women and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) students remains a problem among the ophthalmology workforce. In the residency selection process, research productivity is an important factor. We aimed to determine the average research output listed by applicants and assess for differences by gender and race. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: All San Francisco Match applications to the Wilmer Eye Institute for the 2019, 2020, and 2021 ophthalmology residency cycles were retrospectively reviewed. Each applicant's number of published research articles was recorded and subclassified into first-author publications in any field, publications in ophthalmology, and first-author publications in ophthalmology. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with successful publication. RESULTS: A total of 1376 applications were reviewed. On average, women had a greater number of publications in ophthalmology (2.08 vs 1.73, P = .05) and presentations (4.52 vs 4.09, P = .01) compared with men. Self-identified URiMs were less likely to list publications in ophthalmology (odds ratio [OR] 0.650, P = .05) and first-author publications in ophthalmology (OR 0.570, P = .02) compared to non-URiMs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight disparities in research productivity by self-identified URiM status. On the other hand, women had similar if not higher research outputs than men. Greater research mentorship and opportunities to support URiM students may facilitate the recruitment of diverse trainees to ophthalmology programs.

Detecting Eye Disease Using Vision Transformers Informed by Ophthalmology Resident Gaze Data.

We showcase two proof-of-concept approaches for enhancing the Vision Transformer (ViT) model by integrating ophthalmology resident gaze data into its training. The resulting Fixation-Order-Informed ViT and Ophthalmologist-Gaze-Augmented ViT show greater accuracy and computational efficiency than ViT for detection of the eye disease, glaucoma.Clinical relevance- By enhancing glaucoma detection via our gaze-informed ViTs, we introduce a new paradigm for medical experts to directly interface with medical AI, leading the way for more accurate and interpretable AI 'teammates' in the ophthalmic clinic.

Impact of COVID-19 on cataract surgical competency of ophthalmology residents.

CONTEXT: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a decrease in elective surgeries. PURPOSE: To compare the performance of postgraduate year 4 prepandemic (2018-2019) and pandemic (2021-2022) ophthalmology residents. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was an observational comparative study conducted at a university-based hospital. METHODS: Ophthalmology residents of postgraduate year 4 during prepandemic (2018-2019) and pandemic (2021-2022) time periods were included. The performances of residents in phacoemulsification were scored by a single faculty assessor using the International Council of Ophthalmology's Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for phacoemulsification (ICO-OSCAR: phaco). The scores were compared between the two groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The comparisons between the pre- and post-pandemic groups were performed using the Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Seventy-one surgeries were rated in each group. All task-specific and global scores of the pandemic group were lower than those of the prepandemic group (all P values < 0.001). The maximum intergroup difference was in capsulorrhexis circular completion (difference of 1.21 score, P < 0.001) and tissue handling (difference of 1.21 score, P < 0.001) among task-specific and global scores, respectively. The residents of the two groups had the highest similarity in irrigation and aspiration (difference of 0.61 score, P < 0.001) from task-specific scores and central eye position from global scores (difference of 0.93 score, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected the surgical competency of ophthalmology residents in phacoemulsification.